Posted on November 22nd, 2013 by

Public Invited to Attend Workshops on the State Process and Criteria for Siting Energy Facilities

During the first two weeks of December, the New Hampshire Office of Energy and Planning (OEP) will be holding five workshops around the state to gather input from the public on the processes and criteria used by the state’s Site Evaluation Committee (SEC) to determine whether to permit the construction and operation of energy facilities. These include wind generation projects, natural gas pipelines, and electric transmission lines.  This is an extremely complicated technical and legal issue that needs an informed discussion about how the SEC has performed over the years, how other states address the siting of energy projects, and what the possible repercussions of any potential changes would mean for the state’s energy future.

Northern Pass is just one project that could be affected by changes in the siting process and criteria.  All energy projects proposed in the future may be caught up in such a change as well, a change which could have a ripple effect on jobs, energy costs and economic development for years to come. While this issue is complicated, your voice is important to effectively shape New Hampshire’s energy future.  We ask you to consider attending one of the citizen workshops listed below.  If you’d like to learn more about these workshops or want to attend, please email us at

Workshops begin with sign-in at 5 p.m., and discussion begins at 6 p.m.  They will end at approximately 9:30 p.m.  Space is limited to 150-200 people depending on the site.  You must pre-register to participate, and you may only sign up for one location.

To REGISTER for a Citizen Workshop: click here

December 3: Manchester Memorial High School Cafeteria

December 4: Groveton High School Gymnasium

December 5: Keene Recreation Center

December 9: Town of Newington Main Hall

December 10: Plymouth Regional High School in Plymouth

Why is this important?

Northern Pass must obtain a number of state and federal permits before it can begin construction.  One of these permits is a Certificate of Site and Facility, which grants state authority to proposed energy facilities to move forward. This certificate is given by the Site Evaluation Committee.

The SEC was formed in 1971 by the Legislature to regulate the siting of large electric generating stations and transmission lines.  It reviews a developer’s financial, technical and managerial ability to construct and operate a project.  It also considers whether the project’s development would unduly interfere with “orderly development of the region” or have an “unreasonable adverse effect” on a number of factors, including historic sites, air and water quality, and the public health and safety.

Northern Pass will bring 1,200 megawatts of Canadian hydropower into New Hampshire through a 300 kV high-voltage direct current (HVDC) transmission line, so it must go before the Site Evaluation Committee for approval.  This is expected to happen sometime in 2014.

This well-established process is facing changes because of a bill passed earlier this year aimed at overhauling the system.

Senate Bill 99, also known as SB 99, required the Office of Energy and Planning to hire an outside consulting group to generate reports on the SEC process and its energy facility siting criteria. The consultants were not hired until the end of September and are required to produce two full reports by the end of the year. We feel this is an unrealistic timeline for such a complex and critical undertaking.

The SB 99 citizen workshops have been scheduled as part of this process and are being widely advertised. People are being asked to come and answer questions on complex regulatory topics before the questions that will be asked have even been written. This approach is flawed; more time is needed for the consultants to do an adequate job for any useful information to come out of the workshops.

We have no issue with reviewing government regulations, especially in light of the recent Business Industry Association report calling for a streamlined SEC process.  But at a time when clean sources of power are needed in New England, it is troubling that SB 99 could result in making the process harder for all energy projects, including Northern Pass.  We feel that both New Hampshire and the SEC process are not well-served by a SB 99 process that lacks sufficient time, resources, and expertise in the siting process. The discussion should also provide a meaningful perspective on energy supply issues that are of critical importance to New Hampshire.

What’s at stake?

As it stands, the Legislature’s deadlines, and the efforts of the OEP and its consultants to meet those deadlines, have created a dilemma for those who support a strong and stable energy future for New Hampshire. How do we work within a flawed process and avoid a situation that could produce unreliable data from these workshops, and which would then would then be used by legislators who are determined to prevent the construction of energy projects in New Hampshire?

That is why people with a wide range of opinions should be present at these workshops – not just people opposed to energy projects – to give the state the information it needs to determine whether New Hampshire should change the siting process that has served it well for many years.

The purpose of SB 99 is to review New Hampshire’s current permitting process for energy facility projects, but it has the potential to adversely change the way in which energy projects are sited in New Hampshire.  Despite many siting professionals’ opinions that New Hampshire’s current process works well, opponents of energy projects see SB 99 as an opportunity to create new regulatory hurdles to stop energy development in New Hampshire.  Permitting is a major aspect of any energy project, and adding additional costs, time and regulatory uncertainty has the effect of driving away energy development in our state.

The SB 99 consultant responsible for carrying out the studies is surveying New Hampshire citizens about their views on energy development and permitting.  Your opinion is very important to ensure that permitting of energy projects remains fair and considers the views of all New Hampshire citizens – not just those that oppose energy projects.

Posted on November 22nd, 2013 by

Posted In: Community, Environment, Meetings, Updates

Tags: , ,

Skip to toolbar